Rethinking European Criminal JusticeThe central challenge in creating a European Area of Freedom, Security and Justice is the co-ordination of the different European criminal justice systems. This is necessary because criminals operating internationally cannot be prosecuted successfully using national criminal justice systems the validity of whose decisions is territorially limited. Instead a co-ordinated prosecution system with jurisdiction or enforcement mechanisms for the whole of Europe is necessary for suitable prosecution of criminals operating throughout Europe. A system of this kind must fulfil two criteria: it must provide for efficient prosecution of crime, whilst at the same time maintaining high-level protection of affected citizens’ human rights, which observe the common European constitutional values. A co-ordination of criminal justices systems of this kind is complicated on the inter-state level by substantive and procedural differences between the various national criminal justice systems. Further problems arise because of organisational and factual differences. A systematic concept and the fundamental considerations for the conception of a European criminal law system remain absent. This project aims to produce proposals as to how this gap can be filled. |
| Project category: | Research project |
| Organizational status: | Institute project |
| Project time frame: | Project commences: 2007 Project ends: 2011 |
| Project status: | In progress |
| Project language(s): | English, German |
| Legal system(s): | 18 European legal systems, USA, Nordic Council, EU law |
Head(s) of project:
Contributors / Researchers:
- Various researchers
A first network meeting took place in January 2007.
Project Partners
| Country | Partner | Institution |
| Austria | t.b.c. | |
| Denmark | Vagn Greve | Professor, University of Copenhagen |
| Belgium | Anne Weyemberg | Professor, University of Brussels |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | Almir Maljevic | Senior Researcher, University of Sarajevo |
| France | Peggy Pfützner | Max Planck Institute |
| Finland | Matti Tolvanen | Professor, University of Joensuu |
| Germany | Marc Engelhart | Max Planck Institute |
| Hungary | Judit Jacsó | Assistant, University of Miskolc |
| Iceland | Egill Stephensen | Chief Prosecutor, Rekjavic Police |
| Italy | Giulio Illuminati | Professor, University of Bologna |
| Netherlands | Peter Tak | Professor, Raboud University of Nijmegen |
| Norway | John Reidar Nielsen | Deputy Chief of Police, Hordaland Politidistrikt |
| Poland | Ewa Weigend/Andrzej Sakowicz | Max Planck Institute/University of Bialystock |
| Russian Federation | Sofia Skestakova | Professor, St. Petersburg University of Interior Ministry of Russia |
| Spain | Lorena Bachmeier-Winter | Professor, Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
| Switzerland | Sabine Gless/Jan Wennekers/Annette Frey | Professor, University of Basel/Sabine Gless’ Chair, University of Basel |
| Sweden | Göran Berling | Chief Prosecutor Helsingborg |
| United Kingdom | John Spencer/Chiara Mancuso | Professor, University of Cambridge/University of Cambridge & University of Palermo |
| USA | Marc Miller/Ron Wright | Professor, University of Arizona/Professor, Wake Forest University |
Research Aim
The study described here aims to produce a basis for forming a systematic fundamental concept for the co-ordination of European criminal law. This should provide the foundations of practically realistic models and systems for the future co-operation to be developed.
This conceptualising model and system development will take into consideration that future solutions for co-ordinating European criminal justice can only realistically result from a further development of the regulations and institutions created so far. For this reason the study will not only propose an ideal solution. It will also explore how suitable models can be implemented within the framework of existing contracts as well as in that of the constitution by means of a further development of the institutions and structures already in place.
Research Methodology
Solution concepts and practical models will be developed above all via a legal comparative research approach. Its basis is formed above all by a comparative analysis of selected exemplary national European and other criminal justice systems. The inclusion of federal and inter-national criminal justice systems, which could serve as models for European co-ordination is particularly important.
The project requires not only a description of the respective legal country characteristics and co-operation forms but (in as far as possible in a separate section) also their evaluation both with regard to the effectiveness as well as to the securing of fundamental freedoms, transparency and democratic legitimation via organisational forms. The evaluation of the solutions presented in the reports requested from the country rapporteurs is an aid for the overall evaluation of the criminal justice models. The latter will be constructed in the final report within the legal comparative evaluation by the Max-Planck-Institute. This overall evaluation will occur based both upon the analysis of the country reports as well as the common European organisational and legal principles mentioned above and identified by means of an evaluating legal comparison of the fundamental legal principles in European justice systems, including that surrounding the European Convention on Human Rights.
Publications (selection):
- Sieber, Ulrich: Memorandum für ein Europäisches Modellstrafgesetzbuch. In: JZ, 1997, p. 369 - 381.
- Sieber, Ulrich: Memorandum on a Model European Penal Code. In: European Journal of Law Reform, 1998/99, p. 445 - 471.
- Sieber, Ulrich: À propos code pénale type européen. In: Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1999, Issue⁄Volume 3, p. 34
- Sieber, Ulrich: Memorandum avseende en europeisk modellstrafflag. In: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 1997, p. 237 - 261.